[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ezjail] ezjail-admin update -P

On Jul 15, 2008, at 4:10 PM, Dirk Engling wrote:

Fred Condo wrote:

2) Yes, it would be preferable if ezjail-admin used fully qualified paths to the executables on which it depends.

Well, actually, no. Apparently in this case Proskurin installed portsnap from ports. All tools ezjails depends on should be in PATH by default.

If the user decides to override a certain base system tool, it must have the choice to do so by altering PATH components order.

Yes, of course! I am too much accustomed to having portsnap in the base system.